Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorAnjum, Rani Lill
dc.contributor.authorRocca, Elena
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-17T09:50:43Z
dc.date.available2019-12-17T09:50:43Z
dc.date.created2019-03-15T13:31:36Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2050-084X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2633556
dc.description.abstractScientists seek to eliminate all forms of bias from their research. However, all scientists also make assumptions of a non-empirical nature about topics such as causality, determinism and reductionism when conducting research. Here, we argue that since these 'philosophical biases' cannot be avoided, they need to be debated critically by scientists and philosophers of science.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractPhilosophical bias is the one bias that science cannot avoidnb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePhilosophical bias is the one bias that science cannot avoidnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume8nb_NO
dc.source.journaleLIFEnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.7554/eLife.44929
dc.identifier.cristin1685091
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 240073nb_NO
cristin.unitcode224,40,0,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for helse og velferd
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal