Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorÆsøy, Knut Ove
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T08:58:47Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T08:58:47Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationStudier i Pædagogisk Filosofi. 2014, 3 (1), 27-39nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2244-9140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2436954
dc.description.abstractThis essay is an attempt to participate in a discussion about metaphysics today. I claim that metaphysic now seems silenced or taken for granted. Machiavelli’s idea of fortuna or fate (Norwegian: lagnad) represents question and perception that cannot be recognized empirically. My aim is to place Machiavelli into an ongoing discussion about the distinction between nature and culture and perception of reality (Norwegian: røyndom) as organic or harmonic. As part of this, I will discuss fortuna’s place in modern research based teacher education, which places our fate in the hand of science, the institutionalization of learning and the lack of virtue (Norwegian: dygd). In conclusion, I wish to express some critical remarks on this development, not taking into account the metaphysical speculation.nb_NO
dc.language.isonnonb_NO
dc.publisherAarhus Universitetnb_NO
dc.subjectLagnadnb_NO
dc.subjectDygdnb_NO
dc.subjectKlokskapnb_NO
dc.subjectMetafysikknb_NO
dc.subjectAnamnetisk tenkingnb_NO
dc.subjectVitskapnb_NO
dc.subjectForskingsbasert lærarutdanningnb_NO
dc.subjectInstitusjonalisering av lærdomnb_NO
dc.subjectHistorisk medvitnb_NO
dc.subjectNatur og kulturnb_NO
dc.subjectRøyndomen som organismenb_NO
dc.subjectHarmoninb_NO
dc.titleOm Fortuna - metafysikk i pedagogikken?nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber27-39nb_NO
dc.source.volume3nb_NO
dc.source.journalStudier i Pædagogisk Filosofinb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel