Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKivedal, Bjørnar Karlsen
dc.contributor.authorBorgersen, Trond Arne
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T15:30:19Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T15:30:19Z
dc.date.created2018-08-17T09:00:52Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationNordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research. 2018, 13 (1), 32-53.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1459-5877
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2574677
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the implications of a low interest rate environment (the zero lower bound – ZLB) for the demand for commercial real estate. Investment demand is conventionally assessed by return and risk adjusted return, as given by net present value (NPV) and the Sharpe-ratio. The main question of the paper is whether there is any asymmetry between different evaluation models for the discount rate across different levels of the interest rate. First, we apply a conventional net-present value (NPV) approach, where the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) are used for evaluation. Considering the invariance level of systemic risk, we find WACC to be an alternative to CAPM for offensive and defensive investments when interest rates are close to historical averages. However, at the ZLB, WACC is only an alternative for investments if they carry the same risk as the market such that beta values are close to one. Second, we simulate our models using US data to see how the WACC shortcut performs across time, and especially at the ZLB, in this economy. We see differences between the period preceding the financial crisis and the period after 2010, even though the Federal Funds rate is close to zero in both periods. We relate this to the difference in systemic risk between the two periods, and show how results in the latter period is quite similar across evaluation models.
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherThe Finnish Society of Built Environment Researchnb_NO
dc.subjectcommercial real estatenb_NO
dc.subjectnet-present value (NPV)nb_NO
dc.subjectcapital asset pricing model (CAPM)nb_NO
dc.subjectmodel invariancenb_NO
dc.subjectweighted average cost of capital (WACC)nb_NO
dc.subjectzero lower bound (ZLB)nb_NO
dc.titleCommercial Real Estate at the ZLB: Investment Demand and CAPM-WACC Invariancenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber32-53nb_NO
dc.source.volume13nb_NO
dc.source.journalNordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Researchnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.30672/njsr.68989
dc.identifier.cristin1602559
cristin.unitcode224,60,0,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for økonomi, språk og samfunnsfag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextThis paper analyzes the implications of a low interest rate environment (the zero lower bound – ZLB) for the demand for commercial real estate. Investment demand is conventionally assessed by return and risk adjusted return, as given by net present value (NPV) and the Sharpe-ratio. The main question of the paper is whether there is any asymmetry between different evaluation models for the discount rate across different levels of the interest rate. First, we apply a conventional net-present value (NPV) approach, where the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) are used for evaluation. Considering the invariance level of systemic risk, we find WACC to be an alternative to CAPM for offensive and defensive investments when interest rates are close to historical averages. However, at the ZLB, WACC is only an alternative for investments if they carry the same risk as the market such that beta values are close to one. Second, we simulate our models using US data to see how the WACC shortcut performs across time, and especially at the ZLB, in this economy. We see differences between the period preceding the financial crisis and the period after 2010, even though the Federal Funds rate is close to zero in both periods. We relate this to the difference in systemic risk between the two periods, and show how results in the latter period is quite similar across evaluation models.en
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

  • Tidsskrift- og avisartikler. ØSS [69]
    Samlingen inneholder bidrag fra ansatte ved Avdeling for økonomi, språk og samfunnsfag publisert som tidsskrift- og avisartikler

Vis enkel innførsel