Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEriksson, Rikard
dc.contributor.authorEllingsen, Pål
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-26T12:47:36Z
dc.date.available2020-08-26T12:47:36Z
dc.date.created2020-05-19T08:28:53Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-23
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Organizational Change Management. 2020.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0953-4814
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2674662
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to describe work relations between leaders and counsellors in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV). The study focus on communication, control, work ethos, worldview and Digital Production Management. This article is based on two empirical studies from the same research project at the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV) in the south of Norway called “Leadership and client orientation in NAV”. The research design led to a qualitative interview method being used to collect and analyse the opinions and experiences of the interviewees (Merriam, 2009). The study found (a) that leaders use DPM to control employees, (b) communicative and regulative aspects of working in NAV, (c) contradictory simultaneous work demands on leaders and counsellors, and (d) the symbolic rationality of work in NAV. The aspects (a) to (d) show a specific worldview in NAV. The study also found aspects of work ethos in NAV, such as a strong will to help and do well for the user, and at the same time meet NAV's financial and administrative requirements (Lundquist, 1998; Byrkjeflot, 2008). It is fruitful to describe this situation using the concept of symbolic rationality. Through symbolic rationality, the study has identified the possibility for further research on the hybrid professionalism of leadership and counsellorship, at three levels in the ambidextrous public sector. The first is the epistemological level, where the concept sets limits on how a social situation such as NAV can be spoken about and understood. A second level is the theoretical level, where categories and logics can be formed that are seen as being applicable to work in NAV. The third and final level is the practical level, where the concept of symbolic rationality and the meanings connected with it shape leaders’ and counsellors’ professional practice in the public sector.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.subjectleadershipen_US
dc.subjectcounsellorshipen_US
dc.subjectsymbolic rationalityen_US
dc.subjectpublic sectoren_US
dc.subjectreciprocalen_US
dc.subjectambidextrousen_US
dc.titleSymbolic Rationality in the Public Sectoren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Offentlig og privat administrasjon: 242en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Organizational Change Managementen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JOCM-09-2019-0292
dc.identifier.cristin1811611
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record