Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSætra, Henrik Skaug
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T14:03:41Z
dc.date.available2021-01-29T14:03:41Z
dc.date.created2021-01-13T12:35:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Technoethics. 2021, 12 (1), 87-100.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1947-3451
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2725410
dc.description.abstractIn this article, the core concepts in Thomas Hobbes’s framework of representation and responsibility are applied to the question of machine responsibility and the responsibility gap and the retribution gap. The method is philosophical analysis and involves the application of theories from political theory to the ethics of technology. A veil of complexity creates the illusion that machine actions belong to a mysterious and unpredictable domain, and some argue that this unpredictability absolves designers of responsibility. Such a move would create a moral hazard related to both (a) strategically increasing unpredictability and (b) taking more risk if responsible humans do not have to bear the costs of the risks they create. Hobbes’s theory allows for the clear and arguably fair attribution of action while allowing for necessary development and innovation. Innovation will be allowed as long as it is compatible with social order and provided the beneficial effects outweigh concerns about increased risk. Questions of responsibility are here considered to be political questions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIGI Globalen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectattributionen_US
dc.subjectcomplexityen_US
dc.subjectHobbesen_US
dc.subjectinstrumentalismen_US
dc.subjectresponsibilityen_US
dc.titleConfounding Complexity of Machine Action: A Hobbesian Account of Machine Responsibilityen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Humaniora: 000::Filosofiske fag: 160::Etikk: 164en_US
dc.source.pagenumber87-100en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Technoethicsen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4018/IJT.20210101.oa1
dc.identifier.cristin1870577
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal