Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Helene
dc.contributor.authorFimland, Marius Steiro
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Matthew Peter
dc.contributor.authorSolstad, Tom Erik Jorung
dc.contributor.authorStien, Nicolay
dc.contributor.authorCumming, Kristoffer Toldnes
dc.contributor.authorSæterbakken, Atle Hole
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T09:30:54Z
dc.date.available2021-04-16T09:30:54Z
dc.date.created2020-10-23T11:07:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2020, 2:598284.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2624-9367
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2738065
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to compare neuromuscular activation, kinetics and kinematics in three variations of the deadlift: (1) free weights, (2) free weights with elastic bands as resistance (bands anchored to the ground) and (3) free weights with elastic bands as assistance (bands attached above the bar). Sixteen resistance-trained men performed one repetition of the three variations as fast as possible using a 2-repetition maximum load in randomized and counterbalanced order. Muscle activation (gluteus maximus, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, erector spinae, vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis), kinematics (average-, peak-, and time to peak velocity), and kinetics (average-, peak,-and time to peak force) were measured during the ascending movement. Resisted and assisted deadlifts led to higher average and peak force outputs (p < 0.001–0.037, ES = 0.29–0.58), and time to peak velocity was shorter when compared to the free weights deadlift (p = 0.005–0.010, ES = 0.83–1.01). However, peak force was achieved faster when using free weights (p < 0.001, ES = 1.58–2.10) and assisted deadlifts had a lower peak velocity compared to resisted and free weights deadlift (p = 0.004–0.046, ES = 0.43–0.60). There were no significant differences in muscle activation between the different conditions (p = 0.082–1.000). In conclusion, the assisted and resisted deadlift produced higher force when compared to free weights. However, free weight and resisted deadlift seem more favorable for the barbell velocity. These findings are of importance for athletes and coaches which should select exercise depending on the goal of the session.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectvelocityen_US
dc.subjectforceen_US
dc.subjectvariable resistanceen_US
dc.subjecthip extensionen_US
dc.subjectgluteus maximusen_US
dc.subjecthamstringen_US
dc.subjecterector spinaeen_US
dc.titleAcute Effects of Elastic Bands as Resistance or Assistance on EMG, Kinetics, and Kinematics During Deadlift in Resistance-Trained Menen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2020 Andersen, Pedersen, Fimland, Shaw, Solstad, Stien, Cumming and Saeterbakken.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Idrettsmedisinske fag: 850en_US
dc.source.volume2en_US
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Sports and Active Livingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fspor.2020.598284
dc.identifier.cristin1841768
dc.source.articlenumber598284en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal