Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAroyo, Alexander M.
dc.contributor.authorBruyne, Jan de
dc.contributor.authorDheu, Orian
dc.contributor.authorFosch-Villaronga, Eduard
dc.contributor.authorGudkov, Aleksei
dc.contributor.authorHoch, Holly
dc.contributor.authorJones, Steve
dc.contributor.authorLutz, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorSætra, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Mads
dc.contributor.authorTamò-Larrieux, Aurelia
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-22T10:44:24Z
dc.date.available2021-10-22T10:44:24Z
dc.date.created2021-10-16T13:47:20Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPaladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics. 2021, 12 (1), 423–436.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2080-9778
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2824972
dc.description.abstractThere is increasing attention given to the concept of trustworthiness for artificial intelligence and robotics. However, trust is highly context-dependent, varies among cultures, and requires reflection on others’ trustworthiness, appraising whether there is enough evidence to conclude that these agents deserve to be trusted. Moreover, little research exists on what happens when too much trust is placed in robots and autonomous systems. Conceptual clarity and a shared framework for approaching overtrust are missing. In this contribution, we offer an overview of pressing topics in the context of overtrust and robots and autonomous systems. Our review mobilizes insights solicited from in-depth conversations from a multidisciplinary workshop on the subject of trust in human–robot interaction (HRI), held at a leading robotics conference in 2020. A broad range of participants brought in their expertise, allowing the formulation of a forward-looking research agenda on overtrust and automation biases in robotics and autonomous systems. Key points include the need for multidisciplinary understandings that are situated in an eco-system perspective, the consideration of adjacent concepts such as deception and anthropomorphization, a connection to ongoing legal discussions through the topic of liability, and a socially embedded understanding of overtrust in education and literacy matters. The article integrates diverse literature and provides a ground for common understanding for overtrust in the context of HRI.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjecttrusten_US
dc.subjectovertrusten_US
dc.subjectrobotsen_US
dc.subjectsocial robotsen_US
dc.subjectdeceptionen_US
dc.subjectanthropomorphization liabilityen_US
dc.subjecteducationen_US
dc.titleOvertrusting robots: Setting a research agenda to mitigate overtrust in automationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Alexander M. Aroyo et al., published by De Gruyter.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US
dc.source.pagenumber423–436en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalPaladyn, Journal of Behavioral Roboticsen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2021-0029
dc.identifier.cristin1946400
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal