Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSætra, Henrik Skaug
dc.contributor.authorDanaher, John
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T09:04:47Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T09:04:47Z
dc.date.created2023-09-04T15:23:52Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationAI and Ethics. 2023.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2730-5953
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3122066
dc.description.abstractAI poses both short- and long-term risks, but the AI ethics and regulatory communities are struggling to agree on how to think two thoughts at the same time. While disagreements over the exact probabilities and impacts of risks will remain, fostering a more productive dialogue will be important. This entails, for example, distinguishing between evaluations of particular risks and the politics of risk. Without proper discussions of AI risk, it will be difcult to properly manage them, and we could end up in a situation where neither short- nor long-term risks are managed and mitigated.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectAIen_US
dc.subjectexistential risken_US
dc.subjectrisk managementen_US
dc.subjectrisk analysisen_US
dc.subjectrisk assessmenten_US
dc.titleResolving the battle of short- vs. long-term AI risksen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2023en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Humaniora: 000::Filosofiske fag: 160::Etikk: 164en_US
dc.source.journalAI and Ethicsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s43681-023-00336-y
dc.identifier.cristin2172200
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal