Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBaltzersen, Rolf K.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-25T23:19:32Z
dc.date.available2022-09-25T23:19:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3021116
dc.descriptionChapter 10 in Cultural-historical perspectives on collective intelligence In the era of digital communication, collective problem solving is increasingly important. Large groups can now resolve issues together in completely different ways, which has transformed the arts, sciences, business, education, technology, and medicine. Collective intelligence is something we share with animals and is different from machine learning and artificial intelligence. To design and utilize human collective intelligence, we must understand how its problem-solving mechanisms work. From democracy in ancient Athens, through the invention of the printing press, to COVID-19, this book analyzes how humans developed the ability to find solutions together. This wide-ranging, thought-provoking book is a game-changer for those working strategically with collective problem solving within organizations and using a variety of innovative methods. It sheds light on how humans work effectively alongside machines to confront challenges that are more urgent than what humanity has faced before. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.en_US
dc.description.abstractChapter 10 analyzes the relationship between citizen participation and citizen expertise, particularly in the political domain. New types of intelligent citizen engagement are emerging like mass deliberation, mass voting, and social media activism. Mass deliberation describes the evolvement of new democratic institutions that aim to recruit citizens in direct participation. Two examples, the Citizens' Council in Ostbelgien and the online ideation platform Better Reykjavik, are part of this new trend. Mass voting is another type of citizen participation that has become increasing popularity because of the internet. Technological platforms make it easy to let everyone vote, such as the Five Star Movement does with its party members in Italy. Social media activism has also become increasingly important. This involves both informal political debate and political activism, which the social movement My Stealthy Freedom exemplifies. All these CI projects build on different conception of participatory diversity. In addition, transparent collective work is important in promoting intelligent engagement between large groups, both in scientific work like crowd peer review or political processes like the Icelandic constitutional experiment. However, there is a concern about the threats against democracy that dysfunctional engagement pose such as fake news and echo chambers in social media.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectMass deliberationen_US
dc.subjectCitizens' Council in Ostbelgienen_US
dc.subjectBetter Reykjavik platformen_US
dc.subjectMass votingen_US
dc.subjectFive Star Movementen_US
dc.subjectTransparent collective worken_US
dc.subjectCrowd peer reviewen_US
dc.subjectThe Icelandic experimenten_US
dc.subjectCrowdsourcing bills of lawen_US
dc.subjectSocial media activismen_US
dc.subjectMy Stealthy Freedomen_US
dc.subjectDysfunctional engagementen_US
dc.subjectTight engagementen_US
dc.subjectLoose engagementen_US
dc.titleIntelligent Engagementen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderRolf K. Baltzersenen_US
dc.source.pagenumberpp 276-312en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/9781108981361.010


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal